Re: (meteorobs) Boulder-Size Meteor Almost Struck Australia?

• To: <meteorobs@atmob.org>
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Boulder-Size Meteor Almost Struck Australia?
• From: belatrix <belatrix@ozemail.com.au>
• Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 03:27:35 +0930
• Delivered-To: meteorobs-mhonarc@atmob.org
• Delivered-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• In-Reply-To: <001d01c2580f$2dde6ae0$a200a8c0@hotlink.com.br>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@atmob.org
• User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022

It sounds very much like a big report about a meteor, to tell you the thruth. Otherwise, I would like to say something: we all know that the report was clear and detailed concerning to the phenomen by itself. But, it is necessary to add that, for example: the  noise, the effects that animals show, the sky trail, the vapour,and the noise as well, is not a complete evidence. It is necessary more technical data to anylise all aspects.

Although, I would like to add that, for example, a JET, breaking Mach 1 or 2, produces the say NOISE and VAPOUR and the ANIMALS behaviour  prior then a METEOR by itself.

Great news for a list like this.

8 Lat South
35 long. South

Good Job, Marco Valois

 

• Re: (meteorobs) Boulder-Size Meteor Almost Struck Australia?
• From: <mvallois@hotlink.com.br>

• Prev: Re: (meteorobs) Boulder-Size Meteor Almost Struck Australia?
• Next: Re: (meteorobs) Observation request for morning of 7th
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread