[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
(meteorobs) An evening with the Quadrantids
Now that is what I call a very civilized meteor
shower. Imagine, a productive session of meteor observing from 7 to 11 p.m. On a
moonless Friday evening, no less. I wouldn't have thought it possible.
Although initial forecasts suggested North
America was unfavourably situated for the Quadrantids peak, there are
advantages to living way up here in the Far North (54° N. latitude), and one of
them is that the Quads radiant is nicely circumpolar. As Bob Lunsford wrote
to me,
"There are
not many folks who can say they have actually seen evening Quadrantids."
Well, I can, now.
After virtually skunking us for the Leonids and
Geminids, the weather cooperated almost perfectly. Kim Youmans might not agree,
but at only a few degrees below freezing it was a balmy January evening
requiring only four or five layers. (This ain't Georgia. The last time people in
these parts observed the Quads, it was minus 26.) It cleared off about 6:30
p.m. local time (MST), and clouded up again shortly after 11, but in the interim
I got four solid hours in, doing the Quads on the fourth day of the new
year (UT).
Anyways, my count was of course greatly
diminished by the altitude of the radiant, which transited the northern (!)
meridian right in the middle of the session, around 9 p.m. local time. It
therefore remained at a near constant 13-15° altitude throughout the
session as it rotated across the bottom of its arc from northwest to northeast,
reducing observed rates to a quarter of the derived
ZHR.
There were four of us at the Blackfoot observing
site, the primary dark-sky site of the Edmonton Centre RASC. In alphabetical
order, we were Alister, Bruce, Chris, and Dave, which by my reckoning gave us
half an octave of observers. Alister and I were there specifically to count
meteors, and since he arrived first he got the fabulous Winter Hexagon replete
with guest planets while I turned to the northern horizon. A huge single
curl of mild aurora split the sky from north to south horizons, receded for a
while, then came up again in the neighbourhood of the radiant,
eventually forcing me to turn to the east and south. Midway through the evening
a ripple of cirrus cloud passed through, slightly reducing our limiting
magnitude.
While counts were fairly modest, I was impressed
by the quality of the individual meteors, with a good half of them warranting
individual descriptions on my microcassette recorder. None were excessively
bright, but their intermediate speeds prompted descriptors like "majestic" or
"stately", and several of the nicer ones lasted a second or more as they arced
across a significant segment of the sky. A number of them were distinctly orange
in colour, including one beauty that passed midway between Betelgeuse and
Aldebaran and resembled both, in brightness and colour. Due to the
situation of the radiant, many passed above the tree tops in a virtually
horizontal fashion and most of the rest were rising up in the sky. I got the
impression I was seeing the top half of the shower, but of
course it would have been much less than that.
As usual I counted in ten minute bins, observing
continuously without distraction for all but two or three minutes. All
non-Quads were counted as "sporadic" although I know this isn't strictly
correct. The two best bins (five Quads each) occurred consecutively between
0250 and 0310, however because they occurred in separate hours the
bunching is not apparent in the following:
*******
Time
(UT) Avg.
LM Quads Sporadics
ZHR
0200-0300 6.4
13
14
58
0300-0400 6.3
10
3
45
0400-0500
6.2
3 5
17
0500-0600
6.2 11
6 57
Total
6.3
37
28
45
*******
One surprise was that half the sporadics occurred
in the first hour. Is there any reason sporadics might be more common in the
early evening hours? I can't think of one, other than possibly a more alert
observer. As mentioned, half the meteors in the second hour came in
the first ten minutes, and pickings were very slim for the next two hours
before a nice rebound in the last hour.
Alister also conducted car radio counts, although
I don't know his results I do know they were in the single digits in most bins,
at maybe two or three times the visual rate.
At my home radio system, the recently-christened
Northern Claw Radiometeor Observatory, I had hourly counts of 8, 6,
10, and 19 in the same period as my visual watch, but the antenna is pointed
southeast which I think is not so efficient for a radiant in the north.
Radio counts continued to rise to 25, 15, and 21 in the subsequent three
hours (0600-0900 UT) long after the predicted peak, suggesting that the angle of
antenna offset to the radiant is an important consideration for which allowances
need be made. In general it was a much quieter radio shower than the
Geminids, at least near as I can tell with my current
configuration.
regards, Bruce McCurdy, Edmonton,
Canada